From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d1533431e7e9d2eb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tmoran@bix.com Subject: Re: Nontrivial examples of C interface with Ada Date: 2000/05/25 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 627298158 References: <392CD183.D4668562@research.canon.com.au> X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net X-Trace: news.pacbell.net 959285011 206.170.2.15 (Thu, 25 May 2000 13:03:31 PDT) Organization: SBC Internet Services NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 13:03:31 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >OTOH, if you make it thin as possible, you don't have to do any docs at all >- can't get simpler than that. Another advantage of a thicker binding is that its writer is forced to find out the things that are not obvious, or simply false, in the C docs, and use that knowledge in the implementation & documentation of the thick binding.