From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!gegeweb.org!news.ecp.fr!news.jacob-sparre.dk!loke.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada package registry? Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:46:48 -0600 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <02241ec4-0f95-4f63-9abc-092f167eb59e@googlegroups.com> <56b99d8f$0$297$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: rrsoftware.com X-Trace: loke.gir.dk 1455155209 17202 24.196.82.226 (11 Feb 2016 01:46:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:46:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29488 Date: 2016-02-10T19:46:48-06:00 List-Id: "Alejandro R. Mosteo" wrote in message news:n9cpmm$cud$1@dont-email.me... ... > Also, I think we're witnessing a new case of 'perfect is the enemy of the > good'. Should really a submitted library compile in every OS ever, with > every compiler ever, using the most complex dependencies there to be > found? Just mark what works and what doesn't and let the Ada masses (:-)) > improve on that. No, but it should be crystal clear what assumptions it is making of compilers, target OSes, and hardware. That's where such a repository could be a significant improvement over the current situation. I don't want to start depending on stuff that only works in one situation, but it's pretty hard to tell that for most of the libraries that I've linked to. And even if you only want to work on Linux GNAT, you probably would want to avoid stuff that only works on Windows. And so on. Putting that into some sort of common format would be a worthwhile goal. Randy.