From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEx1bmRpbg==?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada package registry? Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:24:32 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <02241ec4-0f95-4f63-9abc-092f167eb59e@googlegroups.com> <56af17b7$0$301$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <56b06eb8$0$301$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <1454483747.2785.135.camel@obry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:21:41 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2482c96a50cd89a3b1bdf79fe0497387"; logging-data="16507"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18N/dv2u9Fb7srpLyWSfhbt" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:wNDdcv89aRLmRaWqzrYQMkrQjJw= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29441 Date: 2016-02-08T19:24:32+01:00 List-Id: On 2016-02-08 09:38, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On 07/02/2016 21:07, Björn Lundin wrote: >> On 2016-02-07 01:16, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote: > >>> Whether selecting desired data from a large data set is easier or >>> faster with a >>> DBMS or some form of Ada persistent containers is a more interesting >>> question. >> >> That depends on the model amongst many things. >> But that is not the most interesting question. >> That one is about data openess for end users. > > That suggests containers more closed than DB. This is a wrong assumption. Yes I find SQL (DML-part) standardized enough to consider it open. I do not see how a binary blob on disk can be called open, unless there is a way to query it. > SQL is a language, so they are programmers. Most economist that are good in Excel can handle Visual Basic for Applications too. So, perhaps, in a sense they are programmers. >But in my world no customer > writes SQL queries. In my world they do. Not all, but some. > It is just to many DBs, too many tables and too much > data for a customer to learn an handle. And sometimes they want to cross-reference with other systems. Kind of difficult to put that on one vendor. -- -- Björn