From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEx1bmRpbg==?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada package registry? Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 09:16:30 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <02241ec4-0f95-4f63-9abc-092f167eb59e@googlegroups.com> <56af17b7$0$301$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <56b06eb8$0$301$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <1454483747.2785.135.camel@obry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 08:13:39 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6a09ccc49493ecf301ef65af9aa456c7"; logging-data="10643"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+lwFyEA96n5Mr8j20ffIo5" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:RAtt+MJriUax9zc2PdJB+mT4Dno= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29421 Date: 2016-02-08T09:16:30+01:00 List-Id: On 2016-02-07 23:11, Georg Bauhaus wrote: > On 07.02.16 21:11, Björn Lundin wrote: >> On 2016-02-07 11:00, Georg Bauhaus wrote: >>> On 07.02.16 09:02, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >>>> >>>> BTW, the whole idea of exporting something (data) into something >>>> (Excel) shows bogus design. Why cannot the end data consumer access >>>> data directly? >>> >>> They don't know the database. >> >> They do. > > Before this degrades to positioning particular cases against > other particular cases of opposite organisational design: > The crucial bit is that, in the end, access to data (what, how) > is not a consequence of programming decisions. Technical > facilities will be ordered .IFF. they facilitate achieving > what has been agreed on, starting from more general premises > of an organisational nature. > Right. I agree. And I agree with your statement about large organizations hiding the underlaying storage from employees, like in banking systems. That is of course a decision by the system owner, not caused by the design of the system. And also that some system vendors like to keep this underlaying storage from customers as well. And I think that is wrong - in my line of work. In others - like system for hospitals or others keeping more sensible data - it might be a good thing. -- -- Björn