From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEx1bmRpbg==?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada package registry? Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 23:06:44 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <02241ec4-0f95-4f63-9abc-092f167eb59e@googlegroups.com> <56af17b7$0$301$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <56b06eb8$0$301$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <1454483747.2785.135.camel@obry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 22:03:54 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0304f3635dc3627201f2f30fc27545f3"; logging-data="32147"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Sj1UukkQc3DbCAeu6CgrE" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZlWMKiCl2Veql4J2jDTSg67xML0= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29367 Date: 2016-02-05T23:06:44+01:00 List-Id: On 2016-02-05 09:51, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On 04/02/2016 23:04, Björn Lundin wrote: > >> I'd like to hear of an ERP system (or WMS) that does NOT >> use a DBMS, and has customers with 1_000+ employees. > > Well, maybe 80% of ERP code and performance is spent on adapters between > its components, most of which useless. While I don't agree on that percentage I do agree with that it is too much. >There is a great deal of legacy, > legality and custom in ERP systems. You are right that all of them > deploy DBMS (sometimes dozens of). > Nobody knows how smaller and more > maintainable they could be if designed differently. But they never will. > And that is the key conclusion here. There are lots and lots of system that use SQL. And that is a common denominator. Good or bad, but that is the reality, and it will not likely change in many years. Meaning that lots of tools (reports/data mining/business intelligence/buzzword/buzzword again) exists and is a big market. It is no good then to say - I streamed down my linked list of that keeps all of my inventory to a blob that you can access if you write Ada-code only. nor is it ok to say - The 40 mb csv file is todays traceability on pallets, make something useful of it, joined wit 5 other 100+ mb files. You may say RDBMS:es are overused, and perhaps they are, but in my line of work, they are indispensable. -- -- Björn