From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!loke.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada package registry? Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:21:33 -0600 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <02241ec4-0f95-4f63-9abc-092f167eb59e@googlegroups.com> <56af17b7$0$301$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <56b06eb8$0$301$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <1454483747.2785.135.camel@obry.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: rrsoftware.com X-Trace: loke.gir.dk 1454620894 28404 24.196.82.226 (4 Feb 2016 21:21:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 21:21:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29347 Date: 2016-02-04T15:21:33-06:00 List-Id: "Björn Lundin" wrote in message news:n901l6$b7$1@dont-email.me... > On 2016-02-04 17:59, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> On 2016-02-04 17:52, Björn Lundin wrote: >>> On 2016-02-03 23:11, Randy Brukardt wrote: ... > Especially bad is when a customer cannot pull data to Excel. Why would that be hard? I do it all the time in my programs, no database (or even persistent storage) in sight. It's easy to read/write .csv files in Ada, and I believe that someone even has a library for writing .xls files. (I'd like a nice spreadsheet program in Ada, too; one would hope it would stay up more than LibreOffice Calc does. But I can be a realist when necessary...) > As you say - driven by non-Ada tools, but I do not agree upon > replacing them -from a business point of view. The real reason to stick with non-Ada tools is when large parts of the system already are in a non-Ada language, and you're just adding to it. > DBMS is also motivated by its history. It is a proven concept. Yeah, proven to make Larry Ellison very rich! The rise of No_SQL has shown that it's overkill (and even harmful) in many cases. But off topic to discuss here... Randy.