From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60dd4fe7723c0ef
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tmoran@bix.com
Subject: Re: Ada Core Technologies announces GNATCOM
Date: 2000/04/08
Message-ID: <n8vH4.490$uE2.169608@news.pacbell.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 608206405
References: <8ckqv5$maq$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net
X-Trace: news.pacbell.net 955154067 206.170.2.44 (Fri,
 07 Apr 2000 17:34:27 PDT)
Organization: SBC Internet Services
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 17:34:27 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-04-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Does GNATCOM still require Gnat specific pragmas like C_Pass_By_Copy
or Unchecked_Union, and if so, what is the status of those as official
modifications to the Ada standard?