From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,75ffc1f081ec10e3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!203.109.252.33.MISMATCH!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail From: Craig Carey Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Constant record components Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:52:41 +1200 Organization: Ihug Ltd Message-ID: References: <12ad8guf3sg1o0d@corp.supernews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.118.188.194 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: lust.ihug.co.nz 1151819521 26505 203.118.188.194 (2 Jul 2006 05:52:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ihug.co.nz NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 05:52:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5401 Date: 2006-07-02T17:52:41+12:00 List-Id: On Sat, 1 Jul 2006 09:25:06 -0700, "ME" wrote: >What was the rationale for prohibiting constant record components?. The e-mail address of the first author seems to be bad and it won't accept private e-mail. Those who make decisions on preventing Ada from getting constant record fields don't like e-mail communications with persons of comp.lang.ada. Eg., where is Eachus, ... Duff, Dewar, and beyond the most lengthened tendril, Mr Tucker Taft and less known 'friends'. [Cyberkit 3 in Windows mapped "nonodock.net" to "a.gtld-servers.net".] Another address that is probably dud is Mr Carter's "acm.non.spam.org". +- Craig Carey