From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Web Server Installation Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:02:53 -0700 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net; news.eternal-september.org Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:00:12 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="caa759af2a9c666aec02942f6fe5abd6"; logging-data="27022"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19JfC7Apx2wE7OdzOvDK9iRmvaWPcF5beI=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:7ldZLvNG2OrZBaqodLydoKR3f3Y= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29129 Date: 2016-01-14T09:02:53-07:00 List-Id: On 01/14/2016 03:31 AM, n93942011@gmail.com wrote: > I'm attempting to move towards more complicated Ada concepts and delve into > Ada Web applications and Ada Web Server programming, but I'm having trouble > at the starting block with the installation of the AWS from Ada Core. The > system I'm attempting to run it on is Windows 7 with a Cygwin Terminal. When > I run the first make command, $make setup, I get the following: I'm not sure if anyone has ever been able to use AWS on Windows. This has been discussed many times on here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/comp.lang.ada/AWS$20Windows I would 2nd the recommendation to use Gnoga to build Ada web applications. -- Jeff Carter "When Bell Labs were invited to evaluate C against the DoD requirements [for Ada], they said that there was no chance of C meeting the requirements of readability, safety, etc. for which we were striving, and that it should not even be on the list of evaluated languages." William Whitaker 116