From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Interrupt_Handler and "directly specified" Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 10:59:46 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:57:54 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b6ae653727904b40cc0c92bff5195289"; logging-data="12947"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/85/5SQAd0/YfbTvUUlQ8UchGqkU78bZw=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:3HGaSWfvJvlUKswvEontwU0IOI0= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:28491 Date: 2015-11-22T10:59:46+01:00 List-Id: On 20.11.15 22:25, Randy Brukardt wrote: >> I don't know what "directly specified" in RM C.3.1 means, >> exactly. Does it mean just specified as opposed to no >> such aspect specified (in source, near it)? So drop "=> ..." >> for truth? > > "directly specified" means explicitly given on this entity (as opposed to > inheriting a value from some ancestor, which is considered "specified"). > > If you leave the value off of any aspect specification, the value is True. > (see 13.1.1(15/3)). Thank you very much for clarifying. The error is reported, https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68481