From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,93a8020cc980d113
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What is wrong with Ada?
References: <1176150704.130880.248080@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
 <zyBSh.44138$oV.14776@attbi_s21>
 <461B52A6.20102@obry.net> <awirc4gv13.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <461BA892.3090002@obry.net> <yeabxgnsrj.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <82dgve.spf.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <1176226291.589741.257600@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
 <4eaive.6p9.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <sa4ps6apjb7.fsf@margay.local>
 <wccwt0ho2fc.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <1rbtw92apxpl1.1ednvo8v6oiq8$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <aslkgxyvpj.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <hvVPmLqG5zKr@eisner.encompasserve.org> <ufy6qkcs3.fsf@STRIPCAPStelus.net>
From: Markus E Leypold
 <development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de>
Organization: N/A
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:15:47 +0200
Message-ID: <n2d51uka98.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7blZuVQUS2gV7V5yTRr+Ps9OInM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.224.234
X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1177366072 88.72.224.234 (24 Apr 2007 00:07:52
 +0200)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15244
Date: 2007-04-24T00:15:47+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Ray Blaak <rAYblaaK@STRIPCAPStelus.net> writes:

> Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) writes:
>> In article <uk5w2kepu.fsf@STRIPCAPStelus.net>, Ray Blaak <rAYblaaK@STRIPCAPStelus.net> writes:
>> > "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
>> 
>> >> Any actually existing program can be expressed with single natural
>> >> number. 
>> The traditional encounter is for construction of a Fortran compiler.
>> I propose to write the top element, and you write the lower one:
> [clever search omitted]
>
> You can do it that way if you like. 

> I have a much better secret way of finding
> fortran compilers. 

So do I. I just google for a compiler vendor.

> It took me 4 years of university to learn how.

Didn't need 4 years for that. Be free to use my now not so secret
method of finding a Fortran compiler: It's not patented.

Regards -- Markus