From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f23f789345652e5b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!oleane.net!oleane!hunter.axlog.fr!nobody From: Jean-Pierre Rosen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Users of the BON notation among Ada users ? Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:10:13 +0100 Organization: Adalog Message-ID: References: <0e67d712-c126-478f-b1bc-d2d22ae66952@w1g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <25hhkg.t4r.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: mailhost.axlog.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: s1.news.oleane.net 1232351952 12926 195.25.228.57 (19 Jan 2009 07:59:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@oleane.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:59:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4405 Date: 2009-01-19T10:10:13+01:00 List-Id: Nicholas Collin Paul Gloucester a �crit : > On 2009-01-13, Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote: > > |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| > |"Martyn Pike a ?crit : | > | | > |> I have often wondered why HOOD and HRT-HOOD have not remained popular | > |> within the Ada community. Or perhaps they have - anyone care to comment ?| > | | > |Because, unlike UML, they are not simply notations, but true design | > |*methods*. They drive the design process through a precise engineering | > |methodology. [..] | > | | > |[..]" | > |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| > > They do not. Of course the do! And they always did, since the very first days of HOOD. Actually, HOOD is firstly a design method, the notation being there only to help the design. (FYI: I am the one who wrote the description of the full design process for the official HOOD book). > [SNIP long discussion about HRT-HOOD] Please do no focuss on HRT-HOOD. It was a branch from HOOD-3, intended for a specific purpose. When talking about HOOD, please refer to the latest version, HOOD 4. -- --------------------------------------------------------- J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr) Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr