From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Markus_Sch=c3=b6pflin?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: bug in gnatgpl 2015? Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 09:44:30 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <32c623ac-817e-46fc-bb13-c77b47a506a7@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: MdpKeRr+sx3LK7JQiK5aNw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27667 Date: 2015-09-01T09:44:30+02:00 List-Id: Am 01.09.2015 um 02:33 schrieb Leo Brewin: > But given that the bug does not exist in gnat-pro is there any point in sending in this report? As the bug is already fixed in the latest GnatPRO, there really is no point in submitting the report. It will most likely be fixed in the 2016 GPL version. Markus