From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,52a0bacbcdd2da17
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-10 10:27:31 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.nacamar.de!eusc.inter.net!news.eusc.inter.net!boavista.snafu.de!news
From: Michael Erdmann <michael.erdmann@snafu.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: RE: Realtime/embedded project to help with employment.
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 19:26:46 +0200
Organization: http://www.snafu.de/~boavista
Message-ID: <mrbi01-s9d.ln1@boavista.snafu.de>
References: <mailman.4.1060491721.299.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: news.eusc.inter.net 1060536450 12505 213.73.71.191 (10 Aug 2003
 17:27:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@eusc.inter.net
User-Agent: KNode/0.7.1
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:41304
Date: 2003-08-10T19:26:46+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

rleif wrote:

> " Does this refer to the Ada Developers Cooperate License  you are
> referring on your pages?"
> 

> 
> However, I do have an Idea for a limited, useful, and potentially
> profitable commercial product, which I would recommend selling for $25
> with a reasonable royalty if it is used in a product. Microsoft has
> created Smart Tags. An Ada tool kit to create Smart Tags would permit one
> to extend Office 2003. The data types will be in one or more XML schemas
> that extend the present Microsoft Schemas and the methods will be in Ada.
> The data types in the user created XML schema(s) will have a one-to-one
> correspondence with the data types in the Ada packages. The Ada source
> text should be compiled with A#. It would be perfectly permissible to host
> this software including the user created XML schemas on Linux or any other
> operating system.

Why using Add? C# would be the better solution if you want to use 
the software on Windows (.net) and Linux running. 

Michael

> 
> Bob Leif
> 
> Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
> Email rleif@rleif.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Erdmann [mailto:Michael.Erdmann@snafu.de]
> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 8:53 AM
> To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
> Subject: RE: Realtime/embedded project to help with employment.
> 
> rleif wrote:
> 
>> I agree that an Ada OS is too large a project. However, a real-time core
>> that could be used with Linux and that had Ada interfaces to XML
>> constructs should be viable.
> I gues somthing like this has been discussed very often at this place, and
> there are implementations already available. But i am realy wondering
> what you mean by a realtime core?
> 
>> The problem with Linux core components is
>> that one is making a donation to IBM, RedHat, etc. However, a POSIX type
>> binding that could be used with Linux might solve that problem. An Ada
>> version of Xforms that worked under SVG would actually cover many
>> embedded devices.
>> 
>> The Ada page of my web site, www.newportinstruments.com has articles on
>> how multiple individuals can get together for two noble causes: 1)
>> Spreading the use of Ada. And 2) Making money.
>> Bob Leif
> 
> Does this refere to the ada developerscooperate license  you are refering
> on your pages?
> 
> 
> Michael