From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "G.B." <bauhaus@futureapps.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: pragma/aspect Import, Convention parameters
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:24:22 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <mqhr5i$tco$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1215a889y9uxf$.1nolkb1ctch79$.dlg@40tude.net>
Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:22:43 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="b96887e80893c84a90c3007226ca0d1c";
	logging-data="30104"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19X4qWpT64xkyBghf9kBDhUFOZ/MC2L51M="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
In-Reply-To: <1215a889y9uxf$.1nolkb1ctch79$.dlg@40tude.net>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3OS0LNtXIWbqbKQNJ04l7EMonj0=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27435
Date: 2015-08-13T12:24:22+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 13.08.15 10:27, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> But the convention is not an expression.

Maybe reflecting the approaches taken by a compiler
(code generation) vs that of the component that handles
names and locations of external routines (later)?