From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,a19f7b11143e52d2 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!news.weisnix.org!newsfeed.ision.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!ision!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: One united Ada policy for all Linux distributions? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <8b775424-6d49-4fc1-8f9d-f1837d75371e@e21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> <85i738F41eU1@mid.individual.net> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 16:13:05 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 May 2010 16:13:06 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: a8f0721d.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=Ui\MP=fZb9XPU8j_I0DN6_4IUK On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:23:51 +0200, Bj�rn Persson wrote: > Another difference, in addition to the ones Ludovic mentioned, is that the > Debian policy requires static libraries in the -dev packages, while Fedora > strongly discourages packaging static libraries and mandates that they be > kept in -static packages, separate from the dynamic libraries in the -devel > packages, if they really must be included. Isn't Debian's dev = Fedora's devel? -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de