From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "G.B." <bauhaus@futureapps.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Running a preprocessor from GPS?
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:48:42 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <mpdddc$4vk$1@dont-email.me>
References: <e610ca1e-4df6-4fbb-b3a1-ac35694d9072@googlegroups.com>
 <mp645u$abo$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <2df4698f-4c8e-457c-822d-209cb2f8ab5e@googlegroups.com>
 <mp8r8l$fnn$1@loke.gir.dk> <lywpxjxxza.fsf@pushface.org>
 <mpbb7i$vmi$1@loke.gir.dk> <lybneuya0a.fsf@pushface.org>
 <877fpi84o6.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:47:08 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="b96887e80893c84a90c3007226ca0d1c";
 logging-data="5108"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
 posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/MJ/XUH1gwswHiwShAEioSr197Gt6vtY8="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
In-Reply-To: <877fpi84o6.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eT1TMrU0AjlDXNaVZMmDn7QOemE=
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:194523
Date: 2015-07-30T16:48:42+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 30.07.15 09:50, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> Simon Wright wrote:
>>> Simon Wright wrote:
>
>>>>       return Tick * Time_Base ((if System.FreeRTOS.Tasks.In_ISR
>>>>                                 then xTaskGetTickCountFromISR
>>>>                                 else xTaskGetTickCount));
>
>> I dunno. The version below is quite verbose, and verges on being less
>> readable. But this is a style issue, I think.
>>
>>        if System.FreeRTOS.Tasks.In_ISR then
>>           return Tick * Time_Base (xTaskGetTickCountFromISR);
>>        else
>>           return Tick * Time_Base (xTaskGetTickCount);
>>        end if;
>
> I definitely find the latter more readable than the former (at least
> without syntax highlighting).

We now have named conditional expressions, so

   function GetTickCount return T
      is ((if System.FreeRTOS.Tasks.In_Isr
           then xTaskGetTickCountFromISR
           else xTaskGetTickCount));
begin
    return Tick * Time_Base (GetTickCount);
end