From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Does `pragma inline` work when instantiating generic code?
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 20:21:00 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <mp38be$i2q$1@dont-email.me>
References: <12df0d47-d2d3-452b-8de8-27b50ae89c72@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 18:19:26 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="0bb2db648eace777a0b1960affd730a0";
	logging-data="18522"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Qnr1DjgOsxob9Nju3V1rPnMahemALsI8="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
In-Reply-To: <12df0d47-d2d3-452b-8de8-27b50ae89c72@googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ue84zjO4/5ZA8VytAhkGGezx2mU=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27018
Date: 2015-07-26T20:21:00+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 26.07.15 13:15, EGarrulo wrote:
[Subject]
Yes, inlining works with generics; e.g., the GNAT User's Guide
explains how inlining (which requires optimization) affects
source dependence: inlining needs looking into bodies, thence
of instances. In fact, compiler switches are required for your
original example to produce any instructions at all. as it is devoid
of effects, so no op code needs to be generated.