From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1efdd369be089610 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,1d8ab55e71d08f3d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public From: kdp0101@hpmail.lrz-muenchen.de Subject: Re: what DOES the GPL really say? Date: 1997/06/27 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 252913387 Distribution: world Sender: kdp0101@hp11.lrz-muenchen.de References: <33B014E3.3343@no.such.com> <5oqp9s$7vj$1@news.nyu.edu> <33B13BF6.79C7@no.such.com> <33B2ABA6.2A44C487@link.com> <33B2C30C.7EE@does.not.exist.com> Organization: Leibniz Rechenzentrum Muenchen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss Date: 1997-06-27T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Wes Groleau writes: > > However, his company refuses to distribute the sources for their > > product. So, since he can't distribute it appropriately, he says > > he can't incorporate it. > > Almost. It's not so much trying to "hide" the source; it's more > preserving the right to hide it in the future :-) > I suspect they'd even be willing to tell the customer (they get > a copy of the source) "The files ..., ..., and ... are covered > by the GPL. The file ... is used by permission of UCB under the > terms in file .... All others are copyright by us as stated in > file headers." But GPL 2.b does not allow that, at least not if > "contain" means what I think it means. That's what the LGPL is for. -Andi