From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: If not Ada, what else... Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 15:41:16 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <14592326-5070-4663-a864-5684298f3748@googlegroups.com> <004361da-53c4-4ea9-8cc6-38944aa6c7ad@googlegroups.com> <29dd5458-f9ce-4db8-9128-8ab35a9ce5f8@googlegroups.com> <64bc671c-72e5-4924-b703-3b907c69949c@googlegroups.com> <877fq9uj6g.fsf@theworld.com> <65061686-5c8f-433b-9b11-9e228298158e@googlegroups.com> <87k2u96jms.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <06f8a6f9-d219-4d40-b9ac-8518e93839bd@googlegroups.com> <87y4io63jy.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <7a29d3e9-d1bd-4f4a-b1a6-14d3e1a83a4d@googlegroups.com> <87mvz36fen.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <2215b44f-8a89-47c6-a4c4-52b74d2dac45@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6e18a0c32b56725f1c79700f6451d81d"; logging-data="19746"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19VzG9F3YBlk2Ty491FXKkIik8VHS8z4RQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:MyVwBqYgMQNjqw/E5GTttzw4JjI= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:26772 Date: 2015-07-11T15:41:16+02:00 List-Id: On 11.07.15 12:59, Björn Lundin wrote: > On 2015-07-11 12:46, Brian Drummond wrote: >> On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:43:55 -0700, Patrick Noffke wrote: >> >>> On Friday, July 10, 2015 at 2:10:44 PM UTC-5, David Botton wrote: >>>>> I may be missing something here, but I don't see where Ada's type >>>>> system is that much better than C++'s, > >> And you can loop over the enum range (without explicitly naming its first >> and last tokens), and index arrays with them, etc, right? >> > > And also use them is case/switch statements > where missing values generates compiler errors ? Yes. Albeit, without standards bureaucracy! int main() { enum junk_t { One, Two, Three }; enum junk_t junk; switch (junk) { case One: break; case Two: break; } return 0; } clang -Werror main.m main.m:6:11: error: enumeration value 'Three' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch] switch (junk) { ^ 1 error generated. The others have learned from our No-No language!