From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,be98569334bf359
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: John McCabe <john@nospam.assen.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: C++ threads vs. Ada tasks - surprised
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:12:20 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <mmei85h3onua5tpl62f4dh6rtr79gt5nkk@4ax.com>
References: <f02a0d10-acaa-47d3-ade8-2e7bd4030bd8@d4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: RXEkuaSUwmKe0XIGFYSK7A.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.7.9
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FKriq79ka2mu8VSvlsDRb/LNTOs=
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7842
Date: 2009-08-17T12:12:20+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:34:11 -0700 (PDT), Maciej Sobczak
<see.my.homepage@gmail.com> wrote:

>In another thread (pun intended) the discussion on language design
>with regard to threads/tasks got obstructed, so I'm starting a new
>one.

<..snip..>

Have you considered redoing this using the Boost::Thread library? I
imagine that it's a fairly direct mapping on to the posix calls you've
used by the looks of it, but....