From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "G.B." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada design bug or GNAT bug? Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 18:01:26 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <4lrj5zz2u2z.u8x9cf7xzic6.dlg@40tude.net> <58f64fa9-7d0b-44dd-870c-77d9afcb82c4@googlegroups.com> <20cb0651-27ba-40c7-9f14-8d7a03390649@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b96887e80893c84a90c3007226ca0d1c"; logging-data="10972"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19vvt/Y4rTut3K+VM+eKAtfziT6ZyLxq4Q=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:9WLhfHxLnXnrEfX0PCQDINn4xyY= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:26433 Date: 2015-06-23T18:01:26+02:00 List-Id: On 23.06.15 17:57, Niklas Holsti wrote: > Perhaps we can hope that Ada-noveau will be much simpler and therefore > easier to implement, perhaps through more automatic generation of > compilation phases from formal semantics. The approach taken by Ada, like that taken by some former Scheme, is pragma Profile ;-)