From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!loke.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is this a bug in my code or the compiler? Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:06:25 -0500 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <4f4cd4b1-0a6d-441b-a4f7-98add70e4e1e@googlegroups.com> <87k2v6oe6q.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: rrsoftware.com X-Trace: loke.gir.dk 1434405985 10154 24.196.82.226 (15 Jun 2015 22:06:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 22:06:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:26335 Date: 2015-06-15T17:06:25-05:00 List-Id: "Jacob Sparre Andersen" wrote in message news:87k2v6oe6q.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk... > Randy Brukardt wrote: > >> I would have expected this second expression to be illegal, because it >> seems to violate 6.4.1(6.18-19/3). That rule was introduced in Ada >> 2012 along with "in out" function parameters to avoid "obvious" >> dependence on order of evaluation. > > Is there an ACATS test for that rule? (If not, then I'll volunteer to > formulate and submit one.) Not yet. When I was going to write one, there was some talk of changing the rules, so I put it off. And of course it never made it back to the top (yet). Randy.