From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "G.B." <bauhaus@futureapps.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is this a bug in my code or the compiler?
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:03:12 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <mlmpd2$cn8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <4f4cd4b1-0a6d-441b-a4f7-98add70e4e1e@googlegroups.com>
	<1p71vf5ckbudu$.1qcb9ot1jpysk.dlg@40tude.net>	<mlf4j0$slg$1@dont-email.me>
	<1g33axhwakrzx.o6t14iz4jruy.dlg@40tude.net>	<mlgv5n$hqp$1@dont-email.me>
	<12d47zawbqsu2$.fba3cmxkkrq1.dlg@40tude.net>	<mlm9r4$gl9$1@dont-email.me>
	<16cwc4uk0raxi.iinfpkn9sqid$.dlg@40tude.net>	<lysi9ti256.fsf@pushface.org>
	<5hn9aewmwxqo$.18v0zxdvy9ovz.dlg@40tude.net> <lyoakhhvfz.fsf@pushface.org>
Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:01:54 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="b96887e80893c84a90c3007226ca0d1c";
	logging-data="13032"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19lTYtgY1+0PWb49AhJAVtLy86xaKw0hHc="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
In-Reply-To: <lyoakhhvfz.fsf@pushface.org>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:s4WkpNRfrxHvGd26MrTp0EcZNio=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:26330
Date: 2015-06-15T17:03:12+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 15.06.15 16:56, Simon Wright wrote:
> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 13:31:33 +0100, Simon Wright wrote:
>>
>>> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
>>>
>>>>     "+" (Right #> Y, Left #> X);
>>>>
>>>> #> reads evaluated left-to-right.
>>>
>>>     "+" (Right => Y and then Left => X);
>>>
>>> maybe.
>>
>> "and then" could be ambiguous.
>
> ?

It could be a little dangerous in general if there is
a default parameter,

    (Right => Y and then Left >= X);

Also, if there were permission to drop parentheses around
a record literal in

    (Right => Y and then (Left => X));

if this were to make sense somehow.