From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is this a bug in my code or the compiler? Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:48:56 -0700 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net; news.eternal-september.org Message-ID: References: <4f4cd4b1-0a6d-441b-a4f7-98add70e4e1e@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a3855fbfe1a666be9aefba0563039ed5"; logging-data="20292"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18/hzse5WeNN3e3DY+4YpAVYWwPvXz3sx8=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 In-Reply-To: <4f4cd4b1-0a6d-441b-a4f7-98add70e4e1e@googlegroups.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:5l4UaJ23EnEyFjU29gsEfkp5glQ= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:26285 Date: 2015-06-12T09:48:56-07:00 List-Id: On 06/12/2015 08:56 AM, David Botton wrote: > Given: > > function Token_Start (Source : in out Awesome.Source.Source_Type'Class) > return Character; > function Token_End (Source : in out Awesome.Source.Source_Type'Class) > return String; > > The following works: > > function Get_Token_Text (Source : in out Awesome.Source.Source_Type'Class) > return String > is > N : Character := Token_Start (Source); > begin > return N & Token_End (Source); > end Get_Token_Text; > > The following does not work: > > function Get_Token_Text (Source : in out Awesome.Source.Source_Type'Class) > return String > is > begin > return Token_Start (Source) & Token_End (Source); > end Get_Token_Text; Given that the Source parameters to both Token_Start and Token_End are mode "in out", I presume that both functions modify Source and therefore, Token_Start must be called before Token_End. Your 1st version ensures this order; your 2nd does not. You are presuming an order of evaluation of the parameters to "&" that is not guaranteed. What happens if Token_End is called 1st? -- Jeff Carter "Unix and C are the ultimate computer viruses." Richard Gabriel 99