From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,71c743c03ed191fe
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-20 13:16:07 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feedeast.aleron.net!aleron.net!nntp.flash.net!prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Pat Rogers" <progers@classwide.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <38993b18.0209191906.b56b982@posting.google.com>
 <Akzi9.152773$Jo.48440@rwcrnsc53>
 <TCHi9.20341$oU7.1570063505@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>
 <slrnaomhr7.6q6.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
Subject: Re: Beginer problem: variable array size
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID: <mlLi9.20485$CW4.1590316217@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.191.176.180
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net
X-Trace: newssvr11.news.prodigy.com 1032552914 ST000 208.191.176.180 (Fri,
 20 Sep 2002 16:15:14 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:15:14 EDT
Organization: Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com
X-UserInfo1: 
 F[OUS^[BTRU[RID[N[OJNW@@YJ_ZTB\MV@BNMRQIMASJETAANVW[AKWZE\]^XQWIGNE_[EBL@^_\^JOCQ^RSNVLGTFTKHTXHHP[NB\_C@\SD@EP_[KCXX__AGDDEKGFNB\ZOKLRNCY_CGG[RHT_UN@C_BSY\G__IJIX_PLSA[CCFAULEY\FL\VLGANTQQ]FN
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 20:15:14 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29231
Date: 2002-09-20T20:15:14+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Preben Randhol" <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote in message
news:slrnaomhr7.6q6.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no...
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:00:52 GMT, Pat Rogers wrote:
> >
> > Where does the function "&"( Left : Integer; Right : List_Type )
> > return List_Type come from?
>
> ARM95: 4.5.3 states:
>
>   [...]
>
>   3. The concatenation operators & are predefined for every
nonlimited,
>      one-dimensional array type T with component type C. They have
the
>      following specifications:
>
>   4.      function "&"(Left : T; Right : T) return T
>           function "&"(Left : T; Right : C) return T
>           function "&"(Left : C; Right : T) return T
>           function "&"(Left : C; Right : C) return T


Ah yes, right.  Thanks!