From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!loke.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Polymorphism Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 20:29:49 -0500 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <5hbl45anxasb.1jn73i00zgy2i.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: rrsoftware.com X-Trace: loke.gir.dk 1431394189 23123 24.196.82.226 (12 May 2015 01:29:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 01:29:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:25827 Date: 2015-05-11T20:29:49-05:00 List-Id: "slos" wrote in message news:d0b830a1-19c8-462e-b1c8-a2b19e470674@googlegroups.com... Le jeudi 7 mai 2015 21:09:33 UTC+2, Randy Brukardt a écrit : ... > If I remember correctly, I should have verified before posting but it's > already > late, in C++ one can have protected members which can be used by friends. > I can't see in Ada such thing like protected stuff and friends. Maybe > there is ? Ada uses child packages for that sort of functionality; to be a "friend" in Ada, a package has to be a child. Often, a parent and set of children is referred to as a "subsystem". [Private packages also can be part of a subsystem, that's where they're useful.] Unrestricted use of friends appeared to lead to madness (at a minimum, visibility madness), where dependencies go all which ways. Ada limits such dependencies to a single subsystem. (Generally, one wants to minimize dependences.) ... >I am quite happy with the child package solution exposed here by Simon >but then that has disturbed my packages hierarchy... ;-) Yup. There's no free lunch. ;-) Randy.