From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,33e793a459e66944 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: milod@netcom.com (John DiCamillo) Subject: Re: Choosing C++ instead of Ada Date: 1996/10/25 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 192036229 sender: milod@netcom16.netcom.com references: <01bbb6e2$6385d540$23b2fd86@jssmith.csu891.sandia.gov> <326CF7BC.167E@hso.link.com> <326FCA54.167E@lanl.gov> <54pqdo$ndr@mippet.ci.com.au> organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-10-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: amd001@its.maynick.com.au (Andrew Dunstan) writes: >William Clodius (wclodius@lanl.gov) wrote: >: Still I suspect that any reasonable person would agree that the number >: of Ada vendors is significantly less thatn the number of C++ vendors. >The number of smart people is significantly less than the number of >not so smart people. So we should use not so smart programmers because >there are lots of tools around for fixing their mistakes, right? >Or am I missing something here? :-) Yes. You forget that a "bell curve" has two tails. The number of really really stupid people is also much less than the number of average people. So this must be why there are only a few companies that cater to them. :-) GDR (Grinning, Ducking, and Running) -- ciao, milo ================================================================ John DiCamillo Fiery the Angels Fell milod@netcom.com Deep thunder rode around their shores