From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,18f6de557e6897b2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: mheaney@ni.net (Matthew Heaney) Subject: Re: circular unit dependency Date: 1997/05/31 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 245357909 References: <3386d96f.171920@noticias.ibernet.es> <9A7E8196B8D7EE83.E6C868B798076E45.6F1AD9E8B3E01F66@library-proxy.airnews.net> Organization: Estormza Software Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-31T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <9A7E8196B8D7EE83.E6C868B798076E45.6F1AD9E8B3E01F66@library-proxy.airnews.ne t>, clines@delete_this.airmail.net (Kevin Cline) wrote: >Put them both in the same package, since neither is useful without the other. >You are attempting to separate the inseparable. Wonderful advice! At last, someone who is sympathetic to the idea that, yes, different types can go in the same Ada package. What a concept, using the language as it was designed to be used! Mutual dependency of specs is often an indication that you really should have only a single spec, containing the entities from both packages. It's very simple, really. :-) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Matthew Heaney Software Development Consultant (818) 985-1271