From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,baa6871d466e5af9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mheaney@ni.net (Matthew Heaney)
Subject: Re: AQ&S Guidance on pragma Elaborate_Body
Date: 1997/04/22
Message-ID: <mheaney-ya023680002204970735480001@news.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 236600099
References: <528878564wnr@diphi.demon.co.uk> <E8znzn.DM2@world.std.com>
 <mheaney-ya023680002104970942110001@news.ni.net>
 <mheaney-ya023680002104972250240001@news.ni.net> <E91Gty.4DI@world.std.com>
Organization: Estormza Software
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <E91Gty.4DI@world.std.com>, bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A
Duff) wrote:

>    generic
>    package G1 is ... end G1;
>
>    package body G1 is ... end G1;
>
>    generic
>    package G2 is ... end G2;
>
>    with G1;
>    package body G2 is
>        package Inst_1 is new G1;
>    end G2;
>
>    with G2; pragma Elaborate(G2);
>    package P is
>        package Inst_2 is new G2;
>    end P;
>
>This will raise Program_Error.

But isn't G2 supposed to elaborate G1?

with G1; 
pragma Elaborate (G1);   <<<---
package body G2 is
    package Inst_1 is new G1;
end G2;

Isn't G2 supposed to take care of it's own business, and make sure G1 is
elaborated?  This is analogous to P making sure G2 is elaborated.

Matt

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthew Heaney
Software Development Consultant
<mailto:matthew_heaney@acm.org>
(818) 985-1271