From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6eeec5ea37e964f0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: mheaney@ni.net (Matthew Heaney) Subject: Re: Representation clauses and records Date: 1997/11/21 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 291464473 References: <347000b1.4909762@news.geccs.gecm.com> <3475F02C.5585B1B6@aonix.com> Organization: Estormza Software Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-11-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >Brian Orpin wrote: > >> I have played with this before but never fully understood it. Now I need >> to understand it and my colleagues and I have had many hours discussing >> it. The compiler being used is Ada 83. >> >> The question is simple; when declaring a representation clause for a >> record there is an optional alignment clause using 'mod at'. FYI (I know you said you're using Ada 83): Just to let you know: the mod clause you refer to is an obselescent feature of the language (see RM95 J.8). It was replaced by an "alignment clause." -------------------------------------------------------------------- Matthew Heaney Software Development Consultant (818) 985-1271