From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3f280e3f1e97f305
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mheaney@ni.net (Matthew Heaney)
Subject: Re: Finding out parameters which are not written
Date: 1997/08/12
Message-ID: <mheaney-ya023680001208972243430001@news.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 264206738
References: <33F02867.322D@aut.alcatel.at> <33F07EA1.51D1@aut.alcatel.at>
 <EEtC87.9CC@world.std.com>
Organization: Estormza Software
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-08-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <EEtC87.9CC@world.std.com>, bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A
Duff) wrote:

>Of course, none of this solves the more general problem of uninitialized
>objects -- that really requires run-time checks.

Does the safety annex apply here?  Can the Normalize_Scalars pragma apply
to subprogram parameters, too?

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthew Heaney
Software Development Consultant
<mailto:matthew_heaney@acm.org>
(818) 985-1271