From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,514627f9964b6e38
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mheaney@ni.net (Matthew Heaney)
Subject: Re: Using the GNAT defined attribute: 'Enum_Rep
Date: 1997/09/08
Message-ID: <mheaney-ya023680000809972005530001@news.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 270855996
References: <97082719523509@psavax.pwfl.com>
 <340D6C5D.2E53@pseserv3.fw.hac.com> <EG7Enp.3DF@world.std.com>
 <34147DAB.463@pseserv3.fw.hac.com>
Organization: Estormza Software
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-09-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <34147DAB.463@pseserv3.fw.hac.com>, "W. Wesley Groleau x4923"
<wwgrol@pseserv3.fw.hac.com> wrote:


>Nevertheless, I will never write logic that depends on
>_any_ internal representation unless _I_ or the RM specified 
>that representation.

Again, the RM does define internal representation, in RM95 13.4 (8).  See
also paragraph 8a in the AARM.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthew Heaney
Software Development Consultant
<mailto:matthew_heaney@acm.org>
(818) 985-1271