From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,183ebe04e93f0506
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mheaney@ni.net (Matthew Heaney)
Subject: Re: fixed point vs floating point
Date: 1997/12/03
Message-ID: <mheaney-ya023680000312972133130001@news.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 295078070
References: <dewar.881039951@merv>
 <gwinn-0212971958200001@dh5055115.res.ray.com> <dewar.881120537@merv>
 <3485A850.3A92@gsg.eds.com>
Organization: Estormza Software
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-12-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <3485A850.3A92@gsg.eds.com>, nospam@gsg.eds.com wrote:

>Is it perfect? No. But it's no worse than the anomlies in Ada fixed
>point, and those are managable.

I'm confused.  What fixed point anomalies in Ada are you refering to?  Can
you elaborate?

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthew Heaney
Software Development Consultant
<mailto:matthew_heaney@acm.org>
(818) 985-1271