From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9ae5f4553aae9277
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mheaney@ni.net (Matthew Heaney)
Subject: Re: What's wrong with this syntax?
Date: 1996/12/15
Message-ID: <mheaney-ya023280001512962211170001@news.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 204344885
references: <32A6FE0F.7902@lmtas.lmco.com> <587aul$hrd@zeus.orl.mmc.com>
 <32B49811.4C8@acm.org>
content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
organization: Estormza Software
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-12-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <32B49811.4C8@acm.org>, geneo@acm.org wrote:

>        Some_Limit : Constant := 1024;
>        ...
>        for i in 1..(Some_Limit - 2) loop

As Robert Dewar pointed out, it's best to explicitly name the type of the
loop index if you use the loop index to dereference an array, etc

for I in Positive range 1 .. Some_Limit - 2 loop

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthew Heaney
Software Development Consultant
mheaney@ni.net
(818) 985-1271