From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 115aec,f41f1f25333fa601 X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,a3ca574fc2007430 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: mheaney@ni.net (Matthew Heaney) Subject: Re: Ada and Automotive Industry Date: 1996/11/10 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 195737374 references: <3280DA96.15FB@hso.link.com> <1996Nov6.210957.3070@ole.cdac.com> <1996Nov8.183051.21638@ole.cdac.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 organization: Estormza Software mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.realtime Date: 1996-11-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <1996Nov8.183051.21638@ole.cdac.com>, james@cdac.com (James Thiele) wrote: >We didn't find any Ada compiler vendors in the 1986-88 era who >supported preemptive scheduling. And they all talked to us, >because we were potentially a huge customer. Do you know any? Didn't you talk to DEC? >Anyway, I saw this on the realtime newsgroup. If I'd noticed the >crossposting to comp.lang.ada I'd have stayed away. Why stay away? Ada was (originally) designed for real-time embedded applications. If you are an experienced developer of real-time systems then I - and I'm sure everyone else on comp.lang.ada - welcome your input about real-time issues. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Matthew Heaney Software Development Consultant mheaney@ni.net (818) 985-1271