From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,456bbc1eb1b5c5bc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: mheaney@ni.net (Matthew Heaney) Subject: Re: "Density" of Ada 95 vs. Ada 83 Date: 1996/09/22 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 184659786 references: <32419F92.1E13@lmtas.lmco.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 organization: Estormza Software mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-09-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) wrote: >Capers Jones accumulates statistics on lines of code per function >point for hundreds of different languages, which is the inverse of >density. Check out his company's web site (unfortunately, I can't >remember the name of his company -- something like Software Research; >probably a Web search for "Capers Jones" would find it). The name of Jones' company is Software Productivity Research. Their home page is http://www.spr.com/ and the function points info is at http://www.spr.com/library/funcmet.htm BTW, Jones just released the second edition of his book Applied Software Measurement. >-Tucker Taft stt@inmet.com http://www.inmet.com/~stt/ >Intermetrics, Inc. Cambridge, MA USA matt mheaney@ni.net -------------------------------------------------------------------- Matthew Heaney Software Development Consultant mheaney@ni.net (818) 985-1271