"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> a �crit dans le message de news:na0k90h8oii6063v7n6u5mmib5v20b2emh@4ax.com...

> Why that should be told? I'd say that "with" is superfluous.
Oh no! It's one of the nicest features of Ada. The dependance graph of the program is hard-coded, you always know which module needs
which module.

> This might work with bodies, but it does not with specifications. What
> would you do with:
>
> with Foo;
> procedure P (<something here needs visibility of Foo>);
This case is extremely rare in practice. Stand-alone procedures are almost always main programs (and hence have no parameters).

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------
           J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr