From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2ae1a0032f54059
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-08 17:28:51 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.204!attbi_feed4!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc02.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada vs Interfaces.C types
References: <20030109014828.1ba9cb7a.david@realityrift.com>
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Message-ID: <mf4T9.1966$bB6.538@sccrnsc02>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56
X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com
X-Trace: sccrnsc02 1042075730 12.234.13.56 (Thu, 09 Jan 2003 01:28:50 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 01:28:50 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 01:28:51 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32794
Date: 2003-01-09T01:28:51+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> are the following safe to assume?
>
> Interfaces.C.unsigned = Integer
> Interfaces.C.short = Short_Integer
> Interfaces.C.C_Float = Float
> Interfaces.C.double = Long_Float
  No.  It it were, Interfaces.C.thosetypes would be pointless confusion.