From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEx1bmRpbg==?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is Ada 83 still deployed anywhere? Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 13:10:21 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 12:09:38 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="195f64b05712e8334431ea50f5635808"; logging-data="26801"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+8z6qWxh2ifAkih3ncx79P" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:Je5IJeJHC94XFmy2qi+THf0wqnE= Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:192379 Date: 2015-03-01T13:10:21+01:00 List-Id: On 2015-03-01 11:28, Dan Sorensen wrote: > Good point but I wasn't intending to ask any tricky question. I think Ada 83 > code that hasn't been changed to use constructs or libraries from later > versions still qualifies even if they recompile it with a later version for > some reason and use it with newer code etc. Then these may qualify : The core of it is seldom changed and most of that is still Ada83. However new features often uses libraries/constructs from later version of Ada. The system are most likely considered small here. We are not near 173_000 lines of code. -- Björn