From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Dan Sorensen <dan.sorensen@aol.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is Ada 83 still deployed anywhere?
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 10:28:05 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <mcupjl$g1d$1@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <mck52j$4kp$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mcp9ss$gjn$1@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hLZT1mzuRYG8nolAycaAzg.user.speranza.aioe.org
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:25070
Date: 2015-03-01T10:28:05+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Good point but I wasn't intending to ask any tricky question. I think Ada 83
code that hasn't been changed to use constructs or libraries from later
versions still qualifies even if they recompile it with a later version for
some reason and use it with newer code etc.

Dan

On 2015-02-27, Bj??rn Lundin <b.f.lundin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2015-02-25 10:36, Dan Sorensen wrote:
>> Is there still any Ada 83 running?
>
> Depends on what you mean, but most likely yes.
> Definitely yes if you include code once written for
> an Ada83 compiler, but now recompiled with AdaXX.
>
> Migrating Ada83 to something newer - when does it
> stop to be Ada83? When it does not compile for Ada83
> or when one looks at the code and see the main ideas - the
> read thread - implemented in AdaXX.
>
> I mean, If I have Ada83 code and withs package Ada.Directories (which
> came in Ada05) in order to list files in a directory, is it Ada05 code then?
>
>
> --
> Bj??rn