From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ad4585f2971e47c5 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!216.196.110.146.MISMATCH!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:54:22 -0600 From: Brian Drummond Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Need some light on using Ada or not Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:57:12 +0000 Reply-To: brian@shapes.demon.co.uk Message-ID: References: <4d5ef836$0$23753$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <7ibvl6tn4os3njo3p4kek9kop44nke3n7t@4ax.com> <4d5fd57d$0$6992$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <4D617036.4080902@obry.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser X-Trace: sv3-K1H9VmJuUM4wvMPt1VFqamxY5ZkL2gEdxHybQXgT1fJ5yOBIupcUigSNACKaYnlIAj0pyfOJAHejO4h!sCIH0pErc0WwU00vQLa0Eo/nKxadB4pZBuKusc+GSstG/22JKAusW0ZR1drADaD9EM7ot3l5dBqZ!DMk= X-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 2007 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17493 Date: 2011-02-20T19:57:12+00:00 List-Id: On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:49:10 +0100, Pascal Obry wrote: >Jonathan, > >> If you want a multi-core Ada version, this might be a good >> place to break out the Annex E (distributed systems) approach. > >I really don't see how a distributed application could run faster than a >multi-threaded one on a single machine! So PolyORB is certainly not the >solution to this problem. You are probably right ... unless PolyOrb performs better than the 100% overhead (on this test case) imposed by the pthread library (which I think is how Gnat implements its tasking) - Brian.