From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEx1bmRpbg==?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is Ada 83 still deployed anywhere? Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:29:56 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="23e59b4906029a0ce22afc4c4b1f25ee"; logging-data="17015"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Gba5ZQ8nEOoh+q+WZIEZY" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:c0gL/GVunwlWMwOYhFYRtXKlYJc= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:25049 Date: 2015-02-27T09:29:56+01:00 List-Id: On 2015-02-25 10:36, Dan Sorensen wrote: > Is there still any Ada 83 running? Depends on what you mean, but most likely yes. Definitely yes if you include code once written for an Ada83 compiler, but now recompiled with AdaXX. Migrating Ada83 to something newer - when does it stop to be Ada83? When it does not compile for Ada83 or when one looks at the code and see the main ideas - the read thread - implemented in AdaXX. I mean, If I have Ada83 code and withs package Ada.Directories (which came in Ada05) in order to list files in a directory, is it Ada05 code then? -- Björn