From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a3ca574fc2007430
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mazzanti@iei.pi.cnr.it (Franco Mazzanti)
Subject: Re: Ada and Automotive Industry
Date: 1996/12/11
Message-ID: <mazzanti-1112961142160001@131.114.200.115>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 203477053
organization: IEI-CNR
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-12-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


  Franco Mazzanti said:

  > For Ada95, the numbering of "Ada Items" has clealry restarted from
  > 1, but it is not clear how many of the unresolved Ada 83 items
  > would be still applicable to Ada95 (hopefully a small number, but
  > definitively a number greater than zero).

  Robert Dewar said:

  > If there is an Ada 83 AI that is not considered and dealt with in quite
  > a deliberate manner in the Ada 95 RM, it is an oversight, and one that
  > I would be surprised to find ...

  Robert I. Eachus said:

  > Other than that, the only "unresolved" Ada 83 AIs are "study"
  > issues.  These were suggested improvements to the language many of
  > which were considered beyond the state of the art in 1983.  Some study
  > topics were folded into Ada 95, some are still outstanding.


  AI-00828 and AI-00587 (just to mention two) are not catalogued as "study" 
  issues but as "ramifications".  The underlying uncertainty, however,
  has not been removed in Ada95 (A note in the ARM would have probably been   
  sufficient).

Franco Mazzanti