From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!loke.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT GPL is not shareware Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 14:57:16 -0600 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <0Kgqw.953330$_k.685364@fx16.iad> <199c826a-923e-497f-a8e2-9e732c8a5665@googlegroups.com> <87bnmetex4.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <4ae7f0d5-d681-4be9-95bc-b5e789b3ad40@googlegroups.com> <87tx06rve6.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <87lhlirpk0.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <4984c229-bdcd-4032-bd88-cde66482e6df@googlegroups.com> <6950687c-7b03-440e-ba15-e1092f86a3d0@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: rrsoftware.com X-Trace: loke.gir.dk 1423083436 23278 24.196.82.226 (4 Feb 2015 20:57:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 20:57:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:24878 Date: 2015-02-04T14:57:16-06:00 List-Id: "Jedi Tek'Unum" wrote in message news:b09289f2-df64-464b-ab22-def6b2357bdb@googlegroups.com... > On Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 2:36:29 PM UTC-6, Randy Brukardt wrote: ... >> >Yet I can still use it for my own development for free. >> >> And you get what you pay for. :-) > > I don't pay for Ada. :-) Exactly. The best Ada implementations I;ve ever used were never free. ... > I can see that your gripe is that you make a living selling Ada products > and services. And indirectly that if Ada can't generate revenue for > someone > that it shouldn't be used. Hence the hostage term I've used. Replace the word "Ada" by "software" and you'd be corrrect. It's not about Ada, it's about any software; if the developer can't make a living from it, then it necessarily has to be a secondary project (because everyone has to make a living somehow). In which case the quality will suffer. Part of my objection to your rant here is that you keep making this about Ada. It's not about Ada, its about any software with built professionally (or, practically any other way). There's nothing special about Ada in this regard, there are only a few things that truly are available everywhere. Randy.