From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEx1bmRpbg==?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT GPL is not shareware Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 18:03:19 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <0Kgqw.953330$_k.685364@fx16.iad> <87bnmetex4.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <4ae7f0d5-d681-4be9-95bc-b5e789b3ad40@googlegroups.com> <87tx06rve6.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <87lhlirpk0.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <4984c229-bdcd-4032-bd88-cde66482e6df@googlegroups.com> <6950687c-7b03-440e-ba15-e1092f86a3d0@googlegroups.com> <1423034861.30930.71.camel@obry.net> <87vbjicdi1.fsf@ixod.org> <1423039132.25516.4.camel@obry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="691595b33500fda591d2780113176564"; logging-data="24276"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19wRnHpiUKNj1AguC425ODc" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.2.0 In-Reply-To: <1423039132.25516.4.camel@obry.net> Cancel-Lock: sha1:bDmN2+szZc1+2E0whigHS4O0CKw= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:24875 Date: 2015-02-04T18:03:19+01:00 List-Id: On 2015-02-04 09:38, Pascal Obry wrote: > Le mercredi 04 février 2015 à 08:00 +0000, Mark Carroll a écrit : >> No, it also means that those customers can pass it on to anyone else, >> modify and resell it or give it away, whatever. The GPL is about far >> more than just making the source available to customers. > > And? Do we have a single example of this happening? > > That's just fear and doubt to me. And that is powerful. I've tried to convince my bosses that we should deploy/sell on Linux. And use GNAT GPL. But no go, due to the _possibility_ that our competitors may see the source. Of course, in reality this is nonsense. We ship the code to our customers anyway, but they (managers that is) _feel_ confident that no one is allowed to change/re-distribute the code but us. I _highly_ doubt that anyone would dissect our code, and take business advantage of it. However, a real threat (to our business) would be ex-co-workers, that can sell consultant hours, and do changes to the code. So it is partly fear and doubt, but also some more -- Björn