From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bffcdbd805329ff8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-26 18:42:18 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!oleane.net!oleane!freenix!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "David Botton" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada and Internet stuff Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 21:40:22 -0400 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: References: <3B86A962.33CFA1A8@san.rr.com> <9m6j2o$rg3$1@news.huji.ac.il> Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 998876537 21834 137.194.161.2 (27 Aug 2001 01:42:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 01:42:17 +0000 (UTC) To: Return-Path: X-pair-Authenticated: 65.185.64.49 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12439 Date: 2001-08-26T21:40:22-04:00 That is the beauty about COM. Code written for IE 3.0 still works today against IE 6.0. Same goes for the FTP components and just about every other component. The idea of "the moving" APIs has not been an issue for years (at least not at the COM/DCOM level :-) Portability is overated...... too many times I have seen sloppy product do to "portability" when it was clearly known from the start that the product would be running on a single platform. Even when a product needs to truly be cross platform, it often makes more sense to abstract out the components and APIs used and be native on each platform. A little more work, but much more professional results. David Botton "Pascal Obry" wrote in message news:uzo8mzhnz.fsf@wanadoo.fr... > Of course, but for me having native Ada components is not the point I want to > have portable ones. I just don't want to be tied to a specific platform :) > > Also all the nice MS components are changing all the time and there is not the > same ones installed on all computers... You guess, this could be a real > nightmare !!