From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,971aa11c293c3db1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-20 10:01:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!213.56.195.71!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "David C. Hoos" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada The Best Language? Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 12:00:08 -0500 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: References: <3B59CD72@MailAndNews.com> <9j749o$lmp$7@news.tpi.pl> <9j9n9v$djt$1@news.tpi.pl> Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 995648434 53726 137.194.161.2 (20 Jul 2001 17:00:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: To: Return-Path: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10354 Date: 2001-07-20T12:00:08-05:00 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tomasz Wegrzanowski" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada To: Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 11:46 AM Subject: Re: Ada The Best Language? > In article , Lutz Donnerhacke wrote: > >>Compiler (at least gcc) warns when you screw formants. > > > > printf is an runtime interpreter. That's ugly. > > Almost all printfs are compile-time printfs. I beg to differ. All printfs must be run-time interpreters, otherwise they couldn't support variable format strings -- i.e., the string that defines the way the output elements are to be formatted. The other thing about prontf that is different from Ada is the fact that it (as well as many other C functions) takes a variable number of arguments. > Complire could as well support printf or equivalent. > _______________________________________________ > comp.lang.ada mailing list > comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org > http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada >