From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,971aa11c293c3db1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-18 14:15:57 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!freenix!jussieu.fr!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail
From: "David C. Hoos" <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada The Best Language?
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 16:03:10 -0500
Organization: ENST, France
Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
Message-ID: <mailman.995490202.14285.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
References: <5be89e2f.0107170838.c71ad61@posting.google.com>
 <9j1uio$8br$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <5be89e2f.0107171810.1cee29c0@posting.google.com>
 <3B55C6B0.C2ED36@san.rr.com>
 <5be89e2f.0107181251.2a616bc4@posting.google.com>
Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 995490211 46923 137.194.161.2 (18 Jul 2001 21:03:31
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 21:03:31 +0000 (UTC)
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Return-Path: <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.4
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto: comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway <comp.lang.ada.ada.eu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto: comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ada.eu.org/pipermail/comp.lang.ada/>
Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10205
Date: 2001-07-18T16:03:10-05:00

You might want to take a look at this item:
http://greenlime.com/Ada-Malaysia/

----- Original Message -----
From: "codesavvy" <codesavvy@aol.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: Ada The Best Language?


> Darren New <dnew@san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<3B55C6B0.C2ED36@san.rr.com>...
> > codesavvy wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't care if you think I'm trolling, I'm not.  I think the answer
> > > is rather obvious, Ada has nothing to offer that is substantially
> > > better than what C++ offers.
> >
> > Does C++ offer built in and portable multitasking, protected objects,
> > real-time performance, built-in portable interrupt interfacing,
> > distributed programming?
>
> No but do you have any data that measures how much more productive an
> Ada developer is using these features?  BTW I like these features in
> Ada 95 a lot.  I doubt, however, that producitivity is increased
> significantly by having them available.
> _______________________________________________
> comp.lang.ada mailing list
> comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
> http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada
>