From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,62c161ca070efa9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-11 11:27:26 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!213.56.195.71!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: Wilhelm.Spickermann@t-online.de (Wilhelm Spickermann) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Simple Producer/Consumer with Annex E Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 20:26:07 +0200 (CEST) Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 994876045 18539 137.194.161.2 (11 Jul 2001 18:27:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 18:27:25 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Return-Path: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on Linux X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: <200107111927240390.00071225@smtp-po.inetia.pl> X-Sender: 0211750756-0001@t-dialin.net Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9821 Date: 2001-07-11T20:26:07+02:00 On 11-Jul-01 Michal Nowak wrote: >>Ok. So now look at the libraries which were used. For the dynamically linked >>version you can do it as shown below (this is for my version under SuSE 7.1 >>with the present ALT-RPMs and it behaves like your one): > > I did it also. If it may be helpful, here is what I got: > > [vinnie@gemini problem]$ ldd part_receiver > libgarlic-3.12p.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgarlic-3.12p.so.1 (0x40022000) > libgnarl-3.12p.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgnarl-3.12p.so.1 (0x400f5000) > libgnat-3.12p.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgnat-3.12p.so.1 (0x40122000) > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x4027a000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40290000) > libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x403b5000) > libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x403c3000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000) I think this helps as there is no difference in the system libraries between the working program and the failing one. This seems to be a difference between GNAT 3.12p and 3.13p. The problem may lie within gnat3.13p, but the problem may also be in the program. I didn�t see any problem in the program but I didn�t look very closely. I�m sorry, but in the next few weeks I�ll be far away from any computer problem (canoeing in Sweden) and I have to stop contributing now. Good luck! Med v�nliga h�lsningar Vilhelm